Home » Peer Reviews

Peer Reviews

Peer Review 1

  • Jameizie Cuzman

In his analysis has the complete structure. He has cover page and references. He support the reports and he put effort on the assignment. He has a good analysis and such a good ideas how to compare the two reports. I think is missing a good ending conclusion. He has the number of pages on the header and he followed the APA format.

  • Karina Orellana

In her analysis doesn’t have a strong structure, she has only one page. She doesn’t have APA format and missing information. It’s missing the analysis and compare the two lab reports.

She doesn’t have intro and conclusion, both references and page number on the header are missing.

  • Jimmy Ho

In his analysis is missing the structure, he has only 1 page of analysis and the others to is cover page and references. I think he is missing a lots of information and analysis.

He doesn’t have number of pages. He is missing all the APA format

Peer Review 2

Aiza’s paper has a good cover page with APA format. She has a strong introduction about mechanical keyboard, it counts with the history of the mechanical keyboard, with the uses and how is it physically. She didn’t put any outline content, so she is missing that part. In the body she explains the uses and how it supposed to work the mechanical key board. She didn’t put any images in the document. There are not conclusions and references. She follow the APA format. She has a good work, but it’s incomplete. I like the way she organized and write.

Daniel’s paper has a cover page but no follow the APA format it’s underlined and the text is in bold. He didn’t put outline of content. His introduction is strong and understandable. He has two items in the intro the video games consoles and PC’s gaming. So it’s kind of confusing to know of which one he is talking about. It counts with some history of the item and some parts of the computer.

His document it’s missing the pictures of the parts that he is talking about. It’s not like organized. He explains very strong each item and he supported with some ideas. He has a good conclusion and references.

He has to look out for the APA format but overall it’s a really good work.

Both of my teammates have a really good work, with really good ideas. They put a good effort on it.